Renaissance Science and The Electromagnetic Technology of Platonic Love. [sciencetechnology-center.blogspot.com]
Question by : What's the difference between Science Diet Puppy and Science Diet Large Breed Puppy? I have a new puppy and the Vet game me a free sample of Science Diet puppy. He's a GSD and is 41 lbs at about 5 months. I've seen Science Diet Puppy Large Breed as well. Is there a significant difference between the two or is it just marketing? Best answer for What's the difference between Science Diet Puppy and Science Diet Large Breed Puppy?:
Answer by Troll Police Dogs
Some say the large breed formulas have more protein specifically for the fast growing large breed puppies. Beware, you'll get a lot of people saying SD is crap, that your vet gets kickbacks from the company, etc. All of it is BS. Most people don't use the dog food from the vet, so vets really don't make any money off of it. If you pay attention, you'll see their dog food doesn't move all that fast and stays on their shelves for weeks or months at a time. Just to let you know, despite what many on here believe, dogs have lived well and healthy on SD and other types of dog food commonly sold in grocery stores. Many of these same people who say the food is bad don't bother with healthy diets for themselves or their kids, but should you feed your dog something from the grocery store..oh boy. I've had many laugh when they tell me they don't cook, eat a lot of fast food, etc. But their dogs have to eat healthy, but not their kids.
Answer by Calvin- Canadian and Damn Proud!
Um, well, both are bad foods. Other than that, I believe the only difference is that one is larger than the other.
Answer by BYB's ♥ small IQs
Both are pretty low quality foods, but large breed puppy foods SHOULD have LESS protein in them. But, because SD is such crap, the protein amount is still way too high and only slightly lower than the regular puppy food. With a GSD, you should be feeding a low protein food anyway. California Natural has an EXCELLENT large breed puppy food that you should look into. ++Scratch that, it's Innova http://www.petfooddirect.com/Product/6684/Innova-Large-Breed-Puppy-Formula-Dry-Dog-Food
Answer by Elle
The large breed formula has slightly less protein (31.3% vs. 32%) and the large breed food has less fat (16.8% vs. 22.9%). I got those numbers off Science Diet's website, you may want to take a look because I may not have looked at the right "regular" puppy food. With large and giant breed dogs you need to be careful about high fat, high protein foods because you don't want your puppy to put on too much weight too fast as it can stress joints and cause a variety of problems later on in life. As some people have said above, Science Diet is a lower quality food. It's main ingredient is corn which is just filler. Also, they use beet pulp which has been linked to a number of issues like ear infections and allergies (there is some debate about this and I don't know enough to give you a definitive answer) If you can afford to bump your dog up to a middle to high quality food I'd recommend it.
Answer by moof
Science Diet Large Breed Puppy: - 26% protein. - 0.5% phosphorus. - 0.7% calcium. - 8.5% fat. - 356 kcal per cup. (1 kcal, or kilocalorie = 1 food calorie.) Science Diet Puppy: - 25.5% protein. - 0.7% phosphorus. - 1.0% calcium. - 16.5% fat. - 375 kcal per cup. Those are the most obvious differences. Neither is appropriate for any dog, large breed or not, because Science Diet is an extremely low quality brand. I recommend that you read these unbiased analytic reviews: Large Breed Puppy - http://www.dogfoodanalysis.com/dog_food_reviews/showproduct.php?product=1026&cat=all Puppy - http://www.dogfoodanalysis.com/dog_food_reviews/showproduct.php?product=1028&cat=all
Answer by rl1991
Where I work, Science Diet is our #1 dog food. It's very healthy and a very good choice. But if you have a large breed dog, it may get somewhat pricey after a while. You can also try Nutro or Diamond pet food. You can go to any petstore or even your vet and they will help you out alot. Don't try the grocery store brands (Beneful, Pedigree, Iams) they are not the best if you want your dog as healthy as possible. (:
The Fullerene Chemistry life-science of the three 1996 Nobel Laureates in Chemistry was based upon the synergistic engineering principles of Buckminster Fuller, which challenged the basis of 20th Century science. Harvard University's Novatis Professor, Amy Edmonson in her online book titled 'The Fuller Explanation' explains that Buckminster Fuller derived his engineering principles from the mathematics of the Greek philosopher Plato. Most people have heard of the term 'Platonic love' and now that Platonic-Fullerene Chemistry has come into existence, we might ask the question, what practical engineering principles might be associated with Platonic love?
To answer that question we can examine how the new chemistry challenges the general understanding of modern science. The NASA High Energy Astrophysics Division library has published papers arguing that the Platonic tradition of Greek philosophy was based upon fractal geometrical logic. All life-sciences within the present accepted understanding of science, can only be about species moving toward extinction. This is because Einstein's 'Premier law of all Science' demands the total destruction of all life in the universe when all of its heat is radiated away into cold space. On the other hand, Plato's ethical logic is based upon fractal geometry, which we know extends life-science to infinity. The New Measurement of Humanity Project at the University of Florence, on September 24th 2010, was honoured with the Georgio Napolitano Medal on behalf of the Republic of Italy. The Project's upgrading of quantum mechanics to quantum biology, agreed with Plato's logic.
The practical engineering principles we seek, belongs to the difference between aesthetics and ethics. Ethics can now be considered to be part of science itself, rather that being considered to be only about how we use science. We can explain the difference in simplistic terms rather than complex electromagnetic biological ter ms that belongs to quantum biology. We know that the old chemistry we have, does indeed obey Einstein's law of Universal decay. However, we know from the discovery of Sir Isaac Newton's unpublished papers, discovered last century, that Newton held the firm conviction that a more profound natural philosophy existed to balance the energy decay of the mechanical universe. Newton's principles, responsible for this balance, belonged to Plato's lost 'Science for ethical ends'.
During the 18th Century, the philosopher Immanuel Kant defined aesthetics as the theory of art appreciation, but he also sought ethics technology from within the electromagnetic theories of his day, an electric motor to make the one we know as a child's toy by comparison. Kantian aesthetics in the 21st Century has become the basis of a moral logic to guide various types of organisations. An interest in ethical electromagnetic biological science is re-emerging, because of the new Platonic-Fullerene Chem istry.
Any aesthetic consciousness in the beauty of, say, a painting of a lovely mountain range with majestic waterfalls, is about seeing beauty in decay, the waterfalls are eating away at the structure of the mountain. The aesthetic feeling, therefore, belongs to the material world of destructive reality, but it inspires a peaceful harmonic creative intuition in the mind. The Nobel Laureate in Medicine, Svent-Gyoergyi, was so insistent that this material decay was balanced by the evolution of consciousness, that he called scientists who did not realise this, crazy apes and wrote a book with that title. We can now begin to think that the mental harmonics associated with mareialistc aesthetics and the evolution of the mind, might have some great universal ethical purpose and begin to look for the new technologies that Immanuel Kant intuitively glimpsed. This is about the optical spiritual, or holographic, engineering principles that Plato wrote about.
The harmonic balancing of the decay of matter with Sir Isaac Newton's more natural profound balancing philosophy, describes some sort of entanglement between the the energies of decay and evolving creative consciousness. This is known as quantum entanglement, a process existing between quantum mechanics and quantum biology. The biologist Dr Carl Johan Calleman, author of the book 'The Purposeful Universe' has quantised the functioning of the human cell. This allows us to identify the rather incredible nature of Immanuel Kant's sought for ethical electromagnetc ethical technology.
Dr Callerman notes that the male sperm propels itself to the ovum by a tiny electromagnetic motor, which is driving its tail. Upon entry to the ovum, the male motor morphs into a balanced Yin-Yang motor of life. This spark of life programs a universal message of evolution to the first bone created within the embryo, the sphenoid bone. The sphenoid vibrates with the seashell design of the inner ear, to pro vide the electromagnetic music of life that Plato referred to as Pythagoras' Music of the Spheres. Dr Richard Merrick of Texas University, in his book 'Interference' has mapped out the electromagnetic functioning of the Music of the Music of the Spheres within the functioning of evolving consciousness.
The Science-Art Research Centre of Australia discovered the mathematical structure of the Music of the Spheres governing the evolution of seashells through millions of years through space-time The discovery was reprinted by the worlds largest technological research institute IEEE SPIE Milestone Series in Washington in 1990. In 1995 the work won the Institute for Basic Research's Biology Prize for the discovery of new physics laws governing optimum biological growth and development through space-time. Since then, it has been discovered that the human sphenoid bone sings the same Music of the Spheres song of life, meaning that it is now possible to discover a practical tec hnology from what was once called Plato's optical spiritual engineering principles.
The Science-Art Centre obtained experimental evidence by using special 3-D Glasses, of the existence of Plato's spiritual optics by discovering that, over the centuries some artists had unconsciously depicted holographic images into their paintings. The new technology is about humankind's evolving understanding of the nature of Einstien's protege, David Bohm's, infinite holographic universe. Now that the difference between aesthetics and ethics is understood, humankind is poised upon the threshold of what buckminster Fuller referred to as Uopia or Oblivion.
Within the Platonic tradition of Greek philosophy, Aristotle's ethical science was designed to become the basis of an ennobling medical politics for the health of the universe, so that the universe would not allow civilisation to become extinct. The Platonic-Fullerene Chemistry is part of that political medical science and it h as no place for any aesthetic obsession to dominate politics or religious persuasions. For example, aesthetical appreciation of blond blue eyed people becoming a master race is not ethical, as also was using the aesthetics of Angel Physics to legalise the torture and burning alive of countless women and children as witches.
The 2008 Nobel Prize Winner in Medicine Dr Luc Montagnier, is among an emerging group of scholars who claim that evidence has been obtained to show that DNA can transport imprints of itself electromagnetically. To make teleportation ethical it would be necessary to change the general assumption that nature will find some way to cull overpopulation. Transparent global medical scientific research, available to the people must come into existence to allow ethical debate on such issues to occur. That very process, acting in defiance of being governed by the present understanding of unbalanced entropic decay, will demonstrate the existence of new technol ogies, for the betterment of the human condition, far beyond the ability of an entropic mindset to even imagine.
Professor Robert Pope (C)
Suggest Renaissance Science and The Electromagnetic Technology of Platonic Love. Issues
0 comments:
Post a Comment